“Dead souls” and the black accounting of the FMJD management.
Buying voters, blatant lies about future plans, voter fraud, and public manipulation—this is what will accompany tomorrow’s elections. And there is no hope for change.
Those in power are stupid, greedy, and egocentric individuals who lack the necessary knowledge and skills to manage a global sports organization. But let’s take a look at the members (large and very small) that make up the world of draughts.
Statistics are stubborn and dry. So who has a vote in the FMJD, and who are these 46 remaining members? Everyone into the studio!
Group A: “Useless draughts ghosts.”
No one has seen them, but they exist! A total of 13 invisible members, or 28.26% (!!!) of all available votes.
GUINEA-BISSAU, ARUBA, BONAIRE, GUADELOUPE, JAPAN, MACAU CHINA, FINLAND, PAKISTAN, GEORGIA, SLOVENIA, HONG KONG CHINA, INDIA, TOGO
Common features:
The number of invisible agents of the checkerboard front ranges from 0 to 10 (!) in one segment of the name.
General characteristics: Very similar to pizza delivery guys. They are called on holidays or during elections. At the same time, the Holy Spirit apparently votes for the GUADELOUPE segment.
Group B: “Retirement homes for elderly draughts players who are still breathing, or their fiction”
Most of these barely hanging on members remember Lenin and state subsidies. A total of 8 members, or 17.39% of all votes cast.
TURKIYE, PORTUGAL, ISRAEL, GERMANY, USA, AZERBAIJAN, DOMINICAN REPUBLIC, CUBA,
Common features:
The number of draughts players indicated in registration sources is formal and does not correspond to the actual situation. Youth sports and youth tournaments do not exist in principle.
General description: Some of these segments are trying with all their might to break into the leadership of world draughts. The result for draughts is deplorable.
Group C: “Accidental members at this celebration of life”
Forced to remain under the inadequate leadership of the FMJD, but their activity has been reduced to practically zero. Only 3 members, or 6.52% of the available votes.
BRAZIL, KAZAKHSTAN, MOLDOVA
Common features: They support cooperation with all possible draughts organizations. Youth sports are supported. They support active cooperation with the IDF.
General characteristics: Due to the destructive policies of the current leadership, they are unable to actively participate in world draughts under the auspices of the FMJD.
Group D: “Independent and Uncompromising”
Representatives from China, the Netherlands, Estonia, and Mongolia must be represented in the new leadership of the organization. There are 6 members in total (which could also include the federations of Russia, Belarus, Hungary, and Uzbekistan) or 13.04% of all available votes.
NETHERLANDS, ESTONIA, MONGOLIA, CHINA, ITALY, POLAND(part of the federation, our sympathies D. Rezshka, L. Petlitcky)
Common characteristics: They maintain an independent position and may act contrary to the deconstructive activities of the FMJD leadership.
General characteristics: They have a developed structure and financial capabilities for the development of draughts.
Group E: “Swampy terrain with an unclear hue”
This group can be described with a not-so-nice expression: “Small but …”. And they are of no use whatsoever. There are 16 members in total, or 34.78% of all votes.
Common features: Federations (with rare exceptions) with no prospects for development. In some, youth sports are still sluggish, but they exist.
General characteristics: Always go with the flow. Confrontational. Dependent on political preferences.
Disappointing conclusions: If the current leadership remains in power, draughts will face another split, after which the number of feudal draughts principalities will increase. And excessive fragmentation will ultimately lead to an even greater exodus of adults and children from draughts.
Objectively assessing the situation in draughts, we will name just a few reasons why draughts is being destroyed and gradually turning into a sport for impoverished, infantile “intellectuals” who have not found their place in any other sport under the auspices of the FMJD: excessive “clannishness” of the sport without constructive communication between groups to achieve global goals, a complete lack of a unified and interconnected market for goods and services in the field of draughts, a lack of new modern solutions in the field of IT technologies and a refusal to implement them, the “aging” and degradation of the coaching staff, the lack of a management system for both horizontal and vertical interaction, the rapid impoverishment of a large number of federations, etc.
So, before tomorrow, let’s grab some popcorn and enjoy watching the upcoming circus.